Los resultados de la prueba de glifosato están dentro y los resultados, teniendo en cuenta que la mayoría de las madres y simpatizantes evaluados conocen muy bien los OMG y el glifosato y los han estado evitando durante varios meses o años, son alarmantes.
GRACIAS a todas las madres y simpatizantes que generosamente gastaron el tiempo y el dinero para enviar sus muestras de orina y agua. Gracias a Sustainable Pulse por financiar las pruebas de las muestras de leche materna y a las madres que pagaron por enviar sus muestras durante la noche. .
Resumen:
http://sustainablepulse.com/2014/04/06/worlds-number-1-herbicide-discovered-u-s-mothers-breast-milk/
Stephanie Seneff, Senior Research Scientist, MIT
"It is certainly disheartening to know that glyphosate is present in breast milk, but lest you think this means you should not nurse your baby, please be aware that soy-based formula probably also contains glyphosate, possibly in even higher concentrations. The US government has conducted very few studies measuring the amount of glyphosate residue in food, but a report issued by the Department of Agriculture in 2011 showed that over 90% of 300 samples of soy contained glyphosate, and nearly 96% contained AMPA, a derivative of glyphosate. Today, 90% of the soy crop in the US is "Roundup Ready," which means you can spray Roundup on it and it won't die. Contrary to what was claimed, this growth in Roundup Ready crops has led to a tremendous increase in the amount of Roundup applied to our core crops over the past decade.
I had been intensely researching possible connections between autism and a variety of different toxic chemicals in the environment for many years before I thought to take a look at glyphosate as a possible contributor to autism. This delay was of course a consequence of the widely disseminated message that glyphosate is nearly nontoxic to humans. However, once I started looking, I was astonished to find that all of the many comorbidities associated with autism could be explained by glyphosate's known mode of action on biological systems. Anthony Samsel and I have teamed up to write two papers detailing our findings on the diverse ways in which glyphosate disrupts human physiology, and linking glyphosate to a number of diseases and conditions that are currently on the rise in the US - a partial list includes autism, obesity, Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, and various gut disorders like Celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease. We are still researching this topic, and nearly every day we are discovering new ways in which glyphosate can negatively impact health. The problem is that the effects are insidious -- glyphosate erodes your health slowly over time, so that it's hard for people to realize what's happening to them until it's too late."
Reporte completo:
Comparta estos en línea y con sus medios locales.
Parents need to know if their children are being poisoned with glyphosate: which is an antibiotic: antibiotics kill gut bacteria which is 70% of immune system and a chelator: strips the body of the vital nutrients needed to fight cancer, illness and grow.
También es un disruptor endocrino: afecta las hormonas y los defectos de nacimiento.
Glyphosate is sprayed on GMOs during growing, on many staple food crops (wheat, sugar, rice, soy, corn etc) as a drying agent at harvest and on the soil of 160 of our non organic food crops.See our "Samsel" blogs for the EPA list
¡Padres, nuestros niños están siendo atacados por la ingestión diaria de productos químicos tóxicos que se han relacionado con enfermedades mentales, diabetes, obesidad, asma, alergias, autismo, enfermedades autoinmunes y más!
Puede parecer improbable que una sustancia química pueda ser la fuente de tanto daño, pero cuando se entera de cómo funciona el glifosato (básicamente, el SIDA de una hierba destruyendo su sistema inmunológico) todo tiene sentido.
Cuando se entera de que el glifosato destruye las bacterias intestinales y las bacterias intestinales es donde se crean el triptófano, la serotonina (que regula la insulina) y la melatonina, todo tiene sentido.
Cuando se entera de que el glifosato rompe la barrera hematoencefálica y permite que las toxinas ingresen al cerebro, desde las vacunas y el medio ambiente, todo tiene sentido.
Cuando se entera de que el glifosato deteriora la capacidad del hígado para desintoxicarse, permitiendo que se acumulen metales pesados en el cuerpo, todo tiene sentido.
Lo que no tiene sentido es que la EPA y la FDA lo permitan.
Comentarios de la Dra. Stephanie Seneff, coautora con Samsel de dos documentos de glifosato, ambos encontrados en "datos".
Stephanie Seneff, Senior Research Scientist, MIT
"It is certainly disheartening to know that glyphosate is present in breast milk, but lest you think this means you should not nurse your baby, please be aware that soy-based formula probably also contains glyphosate, possibly in even higher concentrations. The US government has conducted very few studies measuring the amount of glyphosate residue in food, but a report issued by the Department of Agriculture in 2011 showed that over 90% of 300 samples of soy contained glyphosate, and nearly 96% contained AMPA, a derivative of glyphosate. Today, 90% of the soy crop in the US is "Roundup Ready," which means you can spray Roundup on it and it won't die. Contrary to what was claimed, this growth in Roundup Ready crops has led to a tremendous increase in the amount of Roundup applied to our core crops over the past decade.
I had been intensely researching possible connections between autism and a variety of different toxic chemicals in the environment for many years before I thought to take a look at glyphosate as a possible contributor to autism. This delay was of course a consequence of the widely disseminated message that glyphosate is nearly nontoxic to humans. However, once I started looking, I was astonished to find that all of the many comorbidities associated with autism could be explained by glyphosate's known mode of action on biological systems. Anthony Samsel and I have teamed up to write two papers detailing our findings on the diverse ways in which glyphosate disrupts human physiology, and linking glyphosate to a number of diseases and conditions that are currently on the rise in the US - a partial list includes autism, obesity, Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, and various gut disorders like Celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease. We are still researching this topic, and nearly every day we are discovering new ways in which glyphosate can negatively impact health. The problem is that the effects are insidious -- glyphosate erodes your health slowly over time, so that it's hard for people to realize what's happening to them until it's too late."
Debemos hablar alto. ¡Debemos dejar de comprar alimentos OGM y alimentos rociados con pesticidas!
Please join us in 4th of July parades to let everyone know about GMOs and pesticides in your town in a single day! If not you who? If not now, when?
Plus it's FUN and so easy to join into a parade. Sign up at www.momsacrossamerica.com/events_all
Write to the EPA Roundup Review manager: [email protected]
Donate to MAA. www.momsacrossamerica.com/donate
Necesitamos que el mundo sepa sobre los OGM y el glifosato.
¡Todos los ingresos van hacia el empoderamiento de las personas en salud y libertad!
Debemos proteger a nuestros hijos AHORA.
Gracias.
Zen honeycutt
Mamás en toda América
PD ¡La buena noticia es que puedes eliminar los niveles detectables de glifosato de tu cuerpo! Compre solo productos orgánicos! o no transgénicos y orgánicos. ¡Gracias!
¿Te gusta esta publicación?
Mostrando 7 reacciones
Inicia sesión con
Si realmente miró esto en este análisis, solo miró las canales finales, el resultado final. Lo que no miró fue el viaje que un animal tuvo que hacer desde su nacimiento hasta el final de su vida. Por tanto, se trata de "supervivientes" de un sistema, no del coste real del sistema. Lamentablemente, al igual que en muchas otras áreas, los problemas mostrados en Dinamarca se han convertido ahora en la norma y se incluyen en la horrible ecuación. Como las observaciones de Monika Kruger se refieren a toda la vida del animal, ¡por supuesto, es una historia diferente! Uno que necesitas aprender ...
Y no olvidemos el resto que nos dan las observaciones de Michael Pollan:
“Le pregunté al gerente del corral de engorda por qué no simplemente rociaban el estiércol licuado en las granjas vecinas. Los agricultores no lo quieren, explicó. Los niveles de nitrógeno y fósforo son tan altos que rociar los cultivos los mataría. No dijo que los desechos de los corrales de engorde también contienen metales pesados y residuos de hormonas, sustancias químicas persistentes que terminan en las vías fluviales aguas abajo, donde los científicos han encontrado peces y anfibios que exhiben características sexuales anormales ”.
- Michael Pollan, El dilema del omnívoro: una historia natural de cuatro comidas
Así que despierta Chuck o sigue soñando ...
Big problems with GM feed
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/Changing_from_GMO_to_non-GMO_soy.php?comment=1
Re the Seralini study in a statement, the peer review journal, FCT’s publishers Elsevier clearly said:
“Unequivocally, the Editor-in-Chief found no evidence of fraud or intentional misrepresentation of the data”
• But the editor said “no definitive conclusions can be reached with this small sample size” (number of rats in the study) and the strain of rat used “regarding the role of either NK603 or glyphosate in regards to overall mortality or tumor incidence”
• The results presented were correct but inconclusive
• The retraction is based only on this inconclusiveness
The study was established as a chronic toxicity study (10 rats needed) not a carcinogenicity study (40 rats needed) and the sample sizes are therefore in accordance with these established protocols.
In which case the study’s finding, that male rats in the treated groups suffered severe liver and kidney dysfunction remain valid as the editor said this study was correct.
Liver congestions and necrosis were 2.5 to 5.5 times higher than in the control group. There were also 1.3 – 2.3 times more instances of “marked and severe” kidney disease.
Even if we set aside the mortality and tumor findings the evidence of chronic toxicity demands that the study is taken seriously and acted upon by the regulatory authorities. Again there is a clear need to replicate this study because:
• If Séralini’s study is flawed and insufficient; so are those of Monsanto for the EU
• If the rats used by Séralini are the wrong strain; so are those of Monsanto for the EU
• If the sample sizes used by Séralini are too small; so are those of Monsanto for the EU
Given that FCT retracted Séralini’s study they should surely revisit the EU ones they published which supported Monsanto’s application.
The only difference was Seralini kept his rats for their lifetime as opposed to Monsanto’s much shorter 90 days!
Andy, here is why we need to adopt the precautionary principle. So I am sure you will all agree that both MMA’s findings as well as Seralini’s should now undergo trials that everyone agrees is the way to remove all doubt. Agreed?
Re the Seralini study in a statement, the peer review journal, FCT’s publishers Elsevier clearly said:
“Unequivocally, the Editor-in-Chief found no evidence of fraud or intentional misrepresentation of the data”
• But the editor said “no definitive conclusions can be reached with this small sample size” (number of rats in the study) and the strain of rat used “regarding the role of either NK603 or glyphosate in regards to overall mortality or tumor incidence”
• The results presented were correct but inconclusive
• The retraction is based only on this inconclusiveness
The study was established as a chronic toxicity study (10 rats needed) not a carcinogenicity study (40 rats needed) and the sample sizes are therefore in accordance with these established protocols.
In which case the study’s finding, that male rats in the treated groups suffered severe liver and kidney dysfunction remain valid as the editor said this study was correct.
Liver congestions and necrosis were 2.5 to 5.5 times higher than in the control group. There were also 1.3 – 2.3 times more instances of “marked and severe” kidney disease.
Even if we set aside the mortality and tumor findings the evidence of chronic toxicity demands that the study is taken seriously and acted upon by the regulatory authorities. Again there is a clear need to replicate this study because:
• If Séralini’s study is flawed and insufficient; so are those of Monsanto for the EU
• If the rats used by Séralini are the wrong strain; so are those of Monsanto for the EU
• If the sample sizes used by Séralini are too small; so are those of Monsanto for the EU
Given that FCT retracted Séralini’s study they should surely revisit the EU ones they published which supported Monsanto’s application.
The only difference was Seralini kept his rats for their lifetime as opposed to Monsanto’s much shorter 90 days!
Here is why we need to adopt the precautionary principle. So I am sure you will all agree that both MMA’s findings as well as Seralini’s should now undergo trials that everyone agrees is the way to remove all doubt. Agreed?
“Monsanto should not have to vouchsafe the safety of biotech food. Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible. Assuring its safety is the FDA’s job.”
– Philip Angell, Monsanto’s director of corporate communications1
“Ultimately, it is the food producer who is responsible for assuring safety.”
– US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)2
“It is not foreseen that EFSA carry out such [safety] studies as the onus is on the [GM industry] applicant to demonstrate the safety of the GM product in question.”
– European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)3
“One thing that surprised us is that US regulators rely almost exclusively on information provided by the biotech crop developer, and those data are not published in journals or subjected to peer review… The picture that emerges from our study of US regulation of GM foods is a rubber-stamp ‘approval process’ designed to increase public confidence in, but not ensure the safety of, genetically engineered foods.”
– David Schubert, professor and head, Cellular Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute, commenting on a comprehensive peer-reviewed study of US government’s regulation of GMOs that he co-authored.
Who is really testing them?
“Monsanto should not have to vouchsafe the safety of biotech food. Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible. Assuring its safety is the FDA’s job.”
– Philip Angell, Monsanto’s director of corporate communications1 (the FDA is the US government’s Food and Drug Administration, responsible for food safety)
“Ultimately, it is the food producer who is responsible for assuring safety.”
– US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)2
“It is not foreseen that EFSA carry out such [safety] studies as the onus is on the [GM industry] applicant to demonstrate the safety of the GM product in question.”
– European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)3
“One thing that surprised us is that US regulators rely almost exclusively on information provided by the biotech crop developer, and those data are not published in journals or subjected to peer review… The picture that emerges from our study of US regulation of GM foods is a rubber-stamp ‘approval process’ designed to increase public confidence in, but not ensure the safety of, genetically engineered foods.”
– David Schubert, professor and head, Cellular Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute, commenting on a comprehensive peer-reviewed study of US government’s regulation of GMOs that he co-authored5,6