Did you hear that the EU now requires the final formulation testing for toxicity and carcinogenicity of pesticides? This is a HUGE win!
¿Qué hay de los Estados Unidos?
Bueno ... aquí la EPA solo permite 1, sí UNO, UNO, solo uno de los ingredientes en un pesticida (no todos) ser probado en "seguridad". No requieren pruebas sinérgicas de la mezcla de ingredientes entre sí o con otros productos químicos que se utilizan en el mismo cultivo o área. Las pruebas de toxicidad a corto plazo también son las favoritas de la industria en un producto químico, no son pruebas de seguridad independientes a largo plazo para detectar daños.
The pesticide manufacturers can pick the LEAST toxic chemical and declare that the "active chemical ingredient" even if that is complete hogwash! For instance, in Roundup Monsanto picked glyphosate, which is harmful over time, meaning with chronic exposure, but the other chemical ingredients in Roundup are 1000X MORE toxic! The other ingredients include arsenic and heavy metals. Don't you think they should be considered as well? Especially since it has been illegal to use arsenic on our food crops for years? And heavy metals are also known to be toxic? And now they are showing up in 95% of the baby food tested?? ARRGHHH! UNACCEPTABLE!
Tóxico significa que el químico mata a más del 50% de los sujetos de prueba de animales o peces en menos de 96 horas. No significa más de 5, 10 o 20 años de baja exposición a la exposición ... que es lo que le sucede a los EE. UU. Cuando consumimos alimentos con residuos de herbicidas de glifosato y otras toxinas como 2,4 -D , Atrazina y dicamba! En pocas palabras, NOSOTROS, la raza humana, somos un gran experimento científico para las compañías químicas y la EPA no está haciendo NADA al respecto.
They even told me, when I asserted to the EPA in person that they had no safety testing to prove glyphosate herbicides were safe for humans because they had not tested on humans..."But of course not, it's not legal or ethical to test pesticides on humans." I said, "Well if it isn't legal or ethical to TEST pesticides on humans...how is it legal or ethical to allow us to consume them in our food and for babies in our breast milk??" They didn't have an answer...
But maybe they have heard us since that visit and the many times we have asked...
Because now they are asking the public if they should test for the synergistic effects - meaning the final formulations, the effects of all the chemicals together??
Our answer is YES!! Will you tell them so? Will you ask your friends to tell them to test the synergistic effects?
The deadline is fast approaching- the EPA is seeking comment on whether to evaluate synergistic toxic effects of the active ingredients in pesticides. Tell them yes before this Thursday 10/24 at midnight ET!! Now is the time to be heard! Click on this link to write in your comments.
Click HERE to comment now!
Include any of the following points:
- It is absolutely imperative to look at the synergistic effects of the full formulations of Enlist Duo, all glyphosate-based herbicides and any chemicals used on our food supply or in our communities.
- The interactions between all substances in a formula and air, water, soil, food, wildlife and plant ecosystems need to be understood fully before approving these products.
- Synergistic effects have to take into consideration the effects on human systems including generational effects, reproductive, and fetal effects.
- We count on you EPA, to be looking out for us not the chemical companies. We expect you to be looking at ALL the variables, how each and every ingredient interacts with other ingredients in the formulation as well as with every living form/system on earth.
Comment by Thursday octubre 24, 2019 by 11:59 ET/ 8:59 PT. Thank you for being our partner in creating health and freedom!
Mostrando 2 reacciones
Inicia sesión con