El día antes del Día de Acción de Gracias, la EPA publicó su Evaluación de evaluación biológica (BE) de los riesgos potenciales de los usos registrados del glifosato para las especies en peligro o amenazadas o su hábitat crítico. Esta acción federal es parte de la Revisión de registro para la licencia de glifosato, que ha estado en curso durante más de diez años, para su nueva aprobación o denegación.

Moms Across America se sintió increíblemente decepcionada por la acciones de la EPA y su negativa a reconocer la evidencia de que el glifosato puede causar cáncer en humanos y sí causa cáncer en animales, como lo identificaron científicos de renombre mundial en el Agencia Internacional para la Investigación sobre el Cáncer en 2015. Uno solo puede suponer que la presión corporativa, debido a miles de millones de dólares en juego en juicios, produjo esa respuesta. Los hallazgos de la EPA sobre el impacto ambiental del herbicida glifosato a las especies en peligro de extinción fueron nuestra única esperanza de un camino hacia las restricciones de este peligroso herbicida que prácticamente es envenenando a todo el planeta.

Hay dos conclusiones importantes de la evaluación:

1. Aunque la EPA insiste en que el glifosato por sí solo no es tóxico para las especies en peligro de extinción y sus hábitats, sí admite que El glifosato formulado es de moderada a muy tóxico para los peces, de muy a muy alto para los invertebrados acuáticos, moderadamente tóxico para los mamíferos y levemente tóxico para las aves en caso de exposición aguda. Esta es una distinción importante porque el glifosato nunca se usa solo. Sin embargo, está aprobado y autorizado solo y, por lo tanto, esa laguna de la política puede conducir a la desaparición de miles de especies en peligro de extinción si la EPA elige considerar solo la evidencia sobre el glifosato solo.
   
   
2. La evaluación de la EPA encontró que los herbicidas de glifosato causan efectos adversos probables (LAA) para el 93% de las especies y el 97% de los hábitats críticos: 1,676 especies y 759 hábitats críticos. Esto significa que continuar permitiendo el uso de glifosato en las vías fluviales, la silvicultura y el paisajismo conducirá a la destrucción de estas especies en peligro de extinción. Sin duda, esperamos que el uso de herbicidas de glifosato se prohíba inmediatamente en estos usos.

Monocrop farming       

The EPA insists that agriculture use, however, does not threaten endangered species... however we assert that it does. Run off of agrochemicals into waterways, drift of chemical spraying, and evaporation of chemical particles which come down in the rain do affect endangered species everywhere. We also assert that this perspective of agriculture is taken primarily because modern day mono crop farming does not foster wildlife populations. The current toxic agriculture system, which destroys the soil and kills insects and mammals, is very different from biodynamic, most organic, and regenerative organic farming methods, which improve the soil, support earthworms, foster the pollinator, birds, and other wildlife populations.

    Biodynamic and Regenerative Organic farming

This following indented sections of this article contain direct excerpts from the executive summary of the glyphosate draft biological evaluation. For the full summary report click here.

The assessment included two steps. In Step 1, for every listed species and designated critical habitat, the EPA determined whether glyphosate will have No Effect (NE) or May Affect (MA) (separate determinations made for each species and critical habitat). For those species and critical habitats with MA determinations, in Step 2, the EPA will determine if glyphosate is Not Likely to Adversely Affect (NLAA) or Likely to Adversely Affect (LAA) each individual species or critical habitat. 

Glyphosate is one of the most widely used herbicides in North America. Glyphosate is a non-selective, systemic herbicide widely used to control weeds in agricultural crops and non-agricultural sites. Glyphosate inhibits an enzyme on the shikimate pathway that is essential for the biosynthesis of some aromatic amino acids in algae, higher plants, bacteria and fungi. Inhibition of this enzyme leads to cell death. Glyphosate is used on a wide variety of agricultural food and feed crops, non-food/feed crops, for plantation/silviculture uses, and for nursery/greenhouse use. Non-agricultural uses include applications for noxious and invasive weed control in aquatic systems, pastures/rangelands, public lands, forestry, and rights-of-way applications. Glyphosate is also used for general weed control or for lawn replacement/renovation in commercial, industrial, and residential areas (by homeowners, landscaping operators, etc.). 

Application equipment includes aircraft and various ground equipment. 

Between 2013 and 2018, the national annual total agricultural usage averaged approximately 280 million pounds of glyphosate whereas the average total treated acreage was 285 million. During this time frame, the crops with the most usage in terms of annual average total pounds of active ingredients applied were soybeans (114 million lbs), corn (90 million lbs), and cotton (20 million lbs). The crops with the most usage in terms of total treated acreage were the same with 114, 93 and 19 million acres treated for soybeans, corn, and cotton, respectively.

Over 21 million pounds of glyphosate are applied to non-agricultural sites annually.

The major transport routes off the treated area for glyphosate include runoff and spray drift. Glyphosate is expected to reach surface water primarily through spray drift; however, transport in runoff may also occur primarily via sorption of glyphosate-metal complexes to eroded soil. The highest concentrations of glyphosate in surface water are in urban environments and in the vicinity of local use areas. 

Technical glyphosate is practically non-toxic to terrestrial and aquatic animals on an acute exposure basis. Toxicity studies, particularly acute aquatic toxicity studies, show that while some formulated products are less toxic than glyphosate active ingredients alone, others can be up to 2 orders of magnitude more toxic. Formulated glyphosate is moderately to highly toxic to fish, highly to very highly toxic to aquatic invertebrates, moderately toxic to mammals, and slightly toxic to birds on an acute exposure basis. 

And yet glyphosate herbicides are sprayed directly into the water and the sprayers believe it is safe!

In both terrestrial and aquatic animals, technical and formulated glyphosate demonstrate a variety of growth and reproductive effects at a range of chronic exposure concentrations.

There have been over 1,000 reported ecological incidents involving glyphosate use for birds, fish, terrestrial invertebrates, and terrestrial plants. 

Effects Determinations

NLAA determinations were made for 119 species and 33 species’ critical habitat and LAA determinations were made for 1676 species and 759 critical habitats. Of the LAA determinations, the majority - 93% of species and 97% of critical habitats - were considered to have moderate evidence. The majority of the moderate evidence designations were based on non-agricultural uses being the main risk drivers and the lack of availability and uncertainty in usage data associated with these use sites. 

Non-agricultural UDLs, including Non-cultivated, Open Space Developed, Right of Way, Forest Trees and Developed were the use sites most frequently associated with predicted impacts to species or critical habitats with LAA determinations, although numerous other non-agricultural and agricultural UDLS may also impact species. The Aquatic Herbicide UDL, which has overlap with all aquatic species ranges and critical habitats, is also anticipated to have potential impacts on aquatic species for which a LAA determination was made. 

Tables 1 and 2 summarize the NE, NLAA and LAA determinations for species and critical habitats.  Table 3 summarizes the strength of evidence classifications for the LAA determinations.

Table 1. Summary of Species Effects Determinations for Glyphosate (Counts by Taxon).

Table 2. Summary of Critical Habitat Effects Determinations for Glyphosate (Counts by Taxon).

Table 3. Classification of LAA Determinations by Strength of Evidence.

COMMENT BY marzo 12, 2021 Commenters are instructed to post comments to the BE docket (see EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0585 at www.regulations.gov). View the prepublication notice of the biological evaluation for glyphosate.

Moms Across America suggests that commenters��call for the EPA to revoke the license for glyphosate immediately, not only for aquatic use and aerial spraying, but for landscaping and agricultural use for this primary reason: drift and run off for any use unavoidably and uncontrollably affect thousands of endangered species and their critical habitats. To allow the use of this chemical herbicide clearly violates the Environmental Protection Act.